Now, Attorney General Pam Bondi has finally released the Epstein list, a collection of 300 politicians and prominent people who were named in the files, telling Congress that all the documents the Department of Justice was required to reveal have now been made public. Kindy, are there big names that are going to be worried about this release? I mean, I looked I think like we had this conversation last week where Joe Rogan was like, «Look, I’m on the list and because I refuse to meet with him.» And that’s what we’re seeing a lot of push back because there are a lot of names Meghan Markle’s on this list. There are a lot of names on this list and there are people that in no way, shape or form had anything to do with Jeffrey Epstein. So, I would like beg people to keep that in mind before judging someone because their name is on the list. Jeffrey Epstein cultivated powerful contacts everywhere from politics to business to entertainment. The real question investigators look for is evidence of criminal participation, not just association. So yes, prominent names do appear on this list.

Hey guys, it’s Adam here. All right, so Pam Bondi just got absolutely destroyed in Congress. And I mean destroyed. She walked into a hearing claiming she’d released all the Epstein files, everything DOJ has. Nothing’s being hidden. And then a Republican prosecutor, someone who’s supposed to be on her side, stood up with receipts and proved she was lying.

So I ask you, Attorney General Pam Bondi, why did you shut down this investigation last July? And why have you not prosecuted former Prince Andrew?

I don’t believe you asked Merrick Garland these questions when he was attorney general and sat before—

I agree with you. I’m reclaiming my time. I agree with you. I agree with you. During the Biden administration, I called for people looking at Epstein files. Merrick Garland dropped the ball—

As did Attorney General Bill Barr, as did Alex Acosta. A whole string of failures, but you are in charge. You have the power to change things, to hold these men accountable and you’re doing the opposite. You’re protecting them. So, I want to move on to another man.

Can I answer—

Donald Trump. I want to move on another question.

Answer your question about protecting—

You answered the question.

You’re saying no. I love this. I want to discuss another man, Donald Trump, who is all over the Epstein files.

He pulled out a list of specific documents that Bondi never released. Internal memos, draft indictments, DOJ emails, stuff that the law explicitly requires her to turn over. And Bondi had no answer. She just sat there as her entire defense fell apart on live television.

Turning now to another major story that we are continuing to follow as we take a live look on Capitol Hill. This as Attorney General Pam Bondi has announced in a letter that all Epstein files have been released consistent with section three of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. That letter addressed to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, Ranking Member Dick Durbin, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, and Ranking Member Jamie Raskin was obtained by Fox News Digital. That letter includes a list of more than 300 high-profile names, including President Trump, Barack and Michelle Obama, Prince Harry, Bill Gates, Woody Allen, Kim Kardashian, Kurt Cobain, Mark Zuckerberg, and Bruce Springsteen. In accordance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, the list of names includes all persons who are or were a government official or politically exposed person and their names appear in the files released under the act at least once, adding that the names appear in a wide variety of contexts.

This is huge because Bondi has been hiding behind this claim that she’s released everything for weeks now, and a member of her own party just proved that’s not true. Here’s what happened. Bondi sent Congress a letter on February 14th claiming that all Epstein files DOJ holds under the Transparency Act have been released. She included a list of about 340 names that appear in the documents. And she basically said, «We’re done. There’s nothing else. Stop asking.» But Congress wasn’t buying it because the files Bondi released were heavily redacted, huge sections blacked out, key names missing, and lawmakers from both parties kept saying, «This doesn’t look like everything. This looks like you’re still hiding stuff.» And Bondi kept insisting, «No, we released everything the law requires. There’s nothing being withheld.»

Well, that claim just got demolished. At a follow-up hearing, a Republican lawmaker who’s also a former prosecutor came prepared. He had internal DOJ inventories, oversight correspondence, specific citations to documents that Bondi never turned over, and he went through them one by one in front of Congress and the cameras. An 86-page prosecution memo from the Southern District of New York. A draft indictment from Florida targeting Epstein co-conspirators. Internal DOJ emails discussing why certain people weren’t charged. All of it specifically referenced in prior litigation and internal records. All of it required under the Epstein Files Transparency Act and none of it released by Bondi’s DOJ.

The lawmaker didn’t just say these documents exist. He proved it. He cited the specific case files where they’re mentioned. He referenced the internal inventories that list them. He showed that DOJ knew about these documents, cataloged them, and deliberately chose not to include them in the public release. So Bondi can’t claim she didn’t know they existed. She can’t claim they’re not relevant. She can’t claim anything except that she got caught lying to Congress about releasing everything.

And this wasn’t some Democrat trying to score political points. This was a Republican, someone who should be on Bondi’s side. But he was so fed up with the cover up that he brought the receipts and exposed her in public. And Bondi had no good answer. She tried to claim that some documents are protected by deliberative process privilege, a legal doctrine that protects internal government discussions. But the problem with that defense is the Transparency Act specifically overrides those protections for Epstein files. The law says you have to release internal memos and emails explaining why prosecutors did or didn’t charge people. That’s literally in the statute. So Bondi can’t hide behind deliberative process. The law stripped that protection away and she knows it, but she’s still trying to use it as an excuse because she’s got nothing else.

This revelation destroys Bondi’s entire defense strategy. For weeks, she’s been telling Congress and the public that everything’s been released, that there’s full transparency, that anyone complaining is just being political. But now, we have proof that’s not true. We have specific documents that she withheld. We have evidence that she knew these documents existed and chose not to release them. And we have a member of her own party calling her out for it in public.

The contempt case against Bondi just got way stronger. Before she could claim it was complicated and she was doing her best, but now Congress can point to concrete examples where she lied about what she’d released. That’s not a compliance issue. That’s obstruction. And the implications are massive. Because if Bondi lied about these documents, what else is she lying about? What other files is she hiding? Are there more memos, more emails, more draft indictments? How many names are still being protected?

The documents Bondi is hiding apparently explain why certain Epstein associates weren’t charged. That means there are people who prosecutors thought could be charged but decided not to. And Bondi is sitting on the memos that explain who those people are and why they got a pass. That’s exactly what Congress and the public demanded transparency about. And Bondi is the one blocking it.

So now she’s facing even more pressure. The contempt proceedings that were already moving forward just got a huge boost because Congress can now point to specific lies Bondi told. They can show she misled them about what was released. And they can argue that her continued refusal to turn over these documents is willful obstruction that deserves the harshest penalties. Daily fines, detention, impeachment, all of it is back on the table. And this time, Bondi doesn’t have the defense that it’s just politics because a Republican prosecutor is the one who exposed her. Her own side turned on her. And that makes this so much worse for Bondi politically and legally.